Current:Home > MyHere's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases -WealthDrive Solutions
Here's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases
View
Date:2025-04-16 21:59:23
The Supreme Court decided 6-3 and 6-2 that race-conscious admission policies of the University of North Carolina and Harvard College violate the Constitution, effectively bringing to an end to affirmative action in higher education through a decision that will reverberate across campuses nationwide.
The rulings fell along ideological lines. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion for both cases, and Justice Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh wrote concurring opinions. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissenting opinion. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has ties to Harvard and recused herself in that case, but wrote a dissent in the North Carolina case.
The ruling is the latest from the Supreme Court's conservative majority that has upended decades of precedent, including overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022.
- Read the full text of the decision
Here's how the justices split on the affirmative action cases:
Supreme Court justices who voted against affirmative action
The court's six conservatives formed the majority in each cases. Roberts' opinion was joined by Thomas, Samuel Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. The chief justice wrote that Harvard and UNC's race-based admission guidelines "cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause."
"Respondents' race-based admissions systems also fail to comply with the Equal Protection Clause's twin commands that race may never be used as a 'negative' and that it may not operate as a stereotype," Roberts wrote. "The First Circuit found that Harvard's consideration of race has resulted in fewer admissions of Asian-American students. Respondents' assertion that race is never a negative factor in their admissions programs cannot withstand scrutiny. College admissions are zerosum, and a benefit provided to some applicants but not to others necessarily advantages the former at the expense of the latter. "
Roberts said that prospective students should be evaluated "as an individual — not on the basis of race," although universities can still consider "an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise."
Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold affirmative action
The court's three liberals all opposed the majority's decision to reject race as a factor in college admissions. Sotomayor's dissent was joined by Justice Elena Kagan in both cases, and by Jackson in the UNC case. Both Sotomayor and Kagan signed onto Jackson's dissent as well.
Sotomayor argued that the admissions processes are lawful under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
"The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment enshrines a guarantee of racial equality," Sotomayor wrote. "The Court long ago concluded that this guarantee can be enforced through race-conscious means in a society that is not, and has never been, colorblind."
In her dissent in the North Carolina case, Jackson recounted the long history of discrimination in the U.S. and took aim at the majority's ruling.
"With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces 'colorblindness for all' by legal fiat," Jackson wrote. "But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life."
Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.
- In:
- Affirmative Action
- Supreme Court of the United States
veryGood! (12)
Related
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- Gun violence data in Hawaii is incomplete – and unreliable
- 5 people perished on OceanGate's doomed Titan sub. Will we soon know why?
- The Real Reason Joan Vassos Gave Her First Impression Rose to This Golden Bachelorette Contestant
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- 5 people perished on OceanGate's doomed Titan sub. Will we soon know why?
- Travis Kelce’s Jaw-Droppingly Luxe Birthday Gift to Patrick Mahomes Revealed
- High School Musical’s Zac Efron and Vanessa Hudgens' Relationship Ups and Downs Unpacked in Upcoming Book
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- Bryce Young needs to escape Panthers to have any shot at reviving NFL career
Ranking
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Sean 'Diddy' Combs denied bail again and will remain in jail until trial
- Orioles hope second-half flop won't matter for MLB playoffs: 'We're all wearing it'
- Nearly 138,000 beds are being recalled after reports of them breaking or collapsing during use
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese change the WNBA’s landscape, and its future
- Kate Spade Outlet's Extra 25% off Sale Delivers Cute & Chic Bags -- Score a $259 Purse for $59 & More
- New Orleans Regional Transit Authority board stalled from doing business for second time this year
Recommendation
North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
Judge dismisses an assault lawsuit against Knicks owner James Dolan and Harvey Weinstein
Martha Stewart Claims Ina Garten Was Unfriendly Amid Prison Sentence
'As fragile as a child': South Carolina death row inmate's letters show haunted man
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
Harvey Weinstein pleads not guilty to new criminal charge in New York
Los Angeles area sees more dengue fever in people bitten by local mosquitoes
Drake London’s shooting celebration violated longstanding NFL rules against violent gestures