Current:Home > MyThe best and worst ages to take Social Security benefits, according to data -WealthDrive Solutions
The best and worst ages to take Social Security benefits, according to data
View
Date:2025-04-15 12:55:42
The age you begin taking Social Security will affect your monthly income for the rest of your life, so it's a decision to be made carefully — especially if you're going to be relying heavily on your benefits in retirement.
The right age to claim will differ from person to person, as it depends largely on your unique circumstances. That said, it can sometimes be helpful to see what the research says about when to file.
In one comprehensive study, researchers studied retirees' claiming decisions to determine the "optimal" age to begin claiming. Here's what the data has to say about the best and worst ages to start taking Social Security.
How age affects your benefits
First, it's important to understand exactly how the age you file for benefits will affect your monthly payments.
To receive the full benefit you're entitled to based on your work history, you'll need to file at your full retirement age (FRA). This age varies by birth year, but it's 67 years old for everyone born in 1960 or later.
By filing as early as possible, at age 62, your benefits will be reduced by up to 30%. You can also delay claiming past your FRA, and by waiting until age 70 to file, you'll receive your full benefit amount plus a bonus of at least 24% per month.
These adjustments are permanent, too. In general, once you begin claiming, your benefit amount is locked in for life (save for annual cost-of-living adjustments). It's crucial, then, to ensure you're making the best possible decision about when to file for Social Security.
The clear winner (and losers)
In a 2019 study, researchers at United Income examined the claiming decisions of retirees, then looked at those retirees' income throughout the rest of their lives. From there, they used that data to determine how many retirees made the optimal choice to maximize their lifetime income.
The clear winner? Age 70. Researchers found that although it's the least popular time to file (with only 4% of retirees filing at that age), around 57% of the study participants could have earned more over a lifetime by waiting until age 70 to claim.
Claiming prior to age 64 was the least optimal age to file, according to the data, as only 6.5% of retirees would maximize their lifetime income by filing at ages 62 or 63.
Filing at the optimal age makes an enormous difference, too. The researchers found that by claiming Social Security at the less-than-ideal age, the average retired household will miss out on around $111,000 in total income over a lifetime.
What's the best age for you?
Again, there's no single correct age for all retirees to file, as it will depend on your situation. But by considering your priorities in retirement, it can make this decision a little easier.
If your main goal is to maximize your monthly income, delaying as long as possible (ideally until age 70) may be your best bet. The average retiree collects around $739 more per month at age 70 than at age 62, according to the Social Security Administration's most recent data released in December 2023. If money is tight in retirement, those larger checks can go a long way.
On the other hand, if retiring earlier is a bigger priority than maximizing your income, claiming early can be a smart move. Money isn't everything, and if you have a strong retirement fund or are willing to make financial sacrifices to retire in your early 60s, claiming early can make it easier to achieve that goal.
Also, it can be smart to take your health into consideration. While it's not the most pleasant topic to think about, if you have reason to believe you may not live well into your 70s or later, it could be a good idea to claim early. You'll still collect smaller payments each month, but you might receive more in total than if you were to delay claiming.
Delaying Social Security until age 70 can be a smart financial move, but finances are only one part of the equation. By looking at the big picture and considering your priorities in retirement, it will be easier to decide on the best age for you.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets" »
veryGood! (214)
Related
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Why Ian Somerhalder, Josh Hartnett and More Stars Have Left Hollywood Behind
- Washington gets past Oregon to win Pac-12 title. What it means for College Football Playoff
- Vermont day care provider convicted of causing infant’s death with doses of antihistamine
- NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
- Strong earthquake that sparked a tsunami warning leaves 1 dead amid widespread panic in Philippines
- Third-party candidate leaves Mexico’s 2024 presidential race. Next leader now likely to be a woman
- AP Top 25: Michigan is No. 1 for first time in 26 seasons, Georgia’s streak on top ends at 24 weeks
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Israel, Hamas reach deal to extend Gaza cease-fire for seventh day despite violence in Jerusalem, West Bank
Ranking
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Louisiana granted extra time to draw new congressional map that complies with Voting Rights Act
- Assailant targeting passersby in Paris attacked and killed 1 person and injured another
- Texas must remove floating Rio Grande border barrier, federal appeals court rules
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Packers activate safety Darnell Savage from injured reserve before Sunday’s game with Chiefs
- The fatal stabbing of a German tourist by a suspected radical puts sharp focus on the Paris Olympics
- How Prince William Is Putting His Own Royal Future Ahead of His Relationship With Prince Harry
Recommendation
Meet the volunteers risking their lives to deliver Christmas gifts to children in Haiti
An Israeli raced to confront Palestinian attackers. He was then killed by an Israeli soldier
Down goes No. 1: Northwestern upsets top-ranked Purdue once again
Erin Andrews’ Gift Ideas Will Score Major Points This Holiday Season
What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
Feeling alone? 5 tips to create connection and combat loneliness
What do we know about Jason Eaton, man accused of shooting 3 Palestinian students
Indigenous Leaders Urge COP28 Negotiators to Focus on Preventing Loss and Damage and Drastically Reducing Emissions